Simplicity 2145: from the inspiration archive
I’m pretty slow at getting around to actually making something from an inspiration. How slow? Well, the inspiration for this make was a dress worn to announce the engagement of a couple who has subsequently married, had a child, and gone on a tropical vacation without said child. Yeah, it’s been a while. In fact, it’s been so long that Simplicity released a knock off pattern of the dress, I bought it, and it has since been discontinued. So while when I initially saw the dress all that time ago, I thought “I can hack that”, I waited long enough that I didn’t have to. See, it was a cunning plan all along! Yeah, no it wasn’t.
The dress is, of course, Simplicity 2145, based on now-Duchess Kate’s engagement dress heard ’round the world. What possessed me to finally make it up now is beyond me. Just before the opening of my show last month, having been suffering from a certain sewing malaise, I thought I’d pull my sewing-with-a-deadline trick and try to make a dress in two days, for opening night. I chose this pattern somewhat at random, but it fitted my requirements of being not-too-hard and suitable-for-winter and already-have-appropriate-fabric. But for once my deadline game didn’t work, and on opening night I only had cut out pieces of a dress and I had to wear something else. So I reassigned my deadline to Valentine’s day the following week. (I finished it in time for our Valentine’s dinner, but why am I just blogging it now? Clearly the excitement for this dress is slightly lacking.)
I pulled the perfect fabric out of my stash (hooray!) – a really nice, heavy, matte ITY jersey, almost certainly from the Crazy Fabric Store in Solvang. Sadly, I hear that the CFS has closed for good. Such a bummer! Granted, for the last year or two it hadn’t really had anything good, but I will always appreciate all the fantastic basics I found there over the years. I have a bunch of these nice heavy solid ITYs from there. Bizarrely, now that my source has dried up, I’m loathe to use them, but this seemed like a worthy use of one of the good cuts.
What I failed to realize, all the way up until I was about to cut it out and I went on PatternReview for some sizing guidance, was that this is inexplicably a pattern for woven fabrics. What? Kate’s dress was jersey, it looks like a million other jersey dresses I’ve seen, I would never in a million years think to make this pattern in a woven. Of course, that could just be my knit-lover’s bias. But still. I did cut my usual size 10-top-12-bottom with a little bit pinched out of the neck line for an SBA, because the ease didn’t seem too bad and I didn’t want it too tight. Where I ran into problems with the woven-to-knit conversion was with the front wrap pieces. I tore out that part of the side seam three times trying to get the right amount of ease in the wrap pieces – too loose and they drooped down in the middle, too tight and they pulled the back tight and gathered the front at the sides in an unattractive manner. I think I reached a good balance finally, or at least a good enough balance.
I made just a couple other adjustments. The sleeves, in addition to being drafted for a woven fabric, have a weird cuff pleat detail that I didn’t want, so I subbed in the sleeves from Simplicity 1716 (because I had it to hand) and they fit well. I also stopped sewing down the skirt pleats at the waistline, so the pleats would open up right under the wrap pieces. I initially shortened the pleats in back too, but they opened up in an unflattering place on my bum, so I went back in and sewed them down to the marked end point. It’s not the best fit in the back, still – I suppose I really should start making an actual swayback adjustment.
The last woven-pattern weirdness I had to deal with was the neckline. It calls for a facing, of course, and of course I never want to do facings. I was torn this time, though, because the facings would give it a nice clean look with no visible neckline stitching. I almost went with the facings… but then I came to my senses. The facing would never turn under neatly and stay there in this poly jersey. So I resorted to my usual clear elastic/twin needle neckline finish. I’ve had a request for a close-up view, so here it is. I zig-zag clear elastic to the wrong side, 2/8 of an inch away from the edge (it’s 3/8ths elastic, so that makes the edge at 5/8ths), then I fold over the neckline along the edge of the elastic and topstitch with a twin needle.
You can see the wide zigzag stitch that is from attaching the elastic to the wrong side, and the tiny narrow zigzag from the twin needle. The twin needle tunneling is worse on this dress than usual because I missed the elastic – usually I get the twin needle line closer to the edge so it sews through the elastic, minimizing tunneling. But, I was in a hurry, so I called it good enough. The thing I most love about this technique, particularly for poly knits and other unpressables, is that the clear elastic creates a nice hard edge that looks sharp without all that mucking about with turning the edge under just right and pressing. It’s also a super stable neckline that won’t stretch or deform. I can’t take credit for this method – I’m sure I encountered it somewhere on teh interwebs, though I’ve no idea where – but I love it and use it on all my v- or crossover necklines.
So, all in all, a nice, practical, dressyish winter dress. I must say, though, that I’ve caught spring fever bad and am no longer interested in making anything with sleeves. And the 80-degree weather we had last week has been backing me up in this regard. But, since it doesn’t actually get warm enough again here to go sleeveless until September, I think I can’t dive into halter dresses yet… so I’ll just have to keep dipping into the inspiration archives.
I might have to look at this pattern myself.. It is a lovely dress and looks absolutely lovely on you.. as does the colour. We are coming up to Autumn here in Australia, so this is a good dress for our weather.
Really pretty and super flattering on you!
You’ve been missed! What kind of show did you have? I love this dress on you, don’t know why enthusiasm is lacking. It’s ok to let things “cook” for a long time when they are timeless, and this dress is.
I’m a stage manager for a theatre company, so I open a new play every 6 weeks or so. Generally a good excuse to make nice dresses in a hurry, since I always put it off til the last moment!
lovely dress and great adaptation into a knit.
Love your dress. The color is beautiful. I had no idea it was a famous dress. I’m working on this same pattern but the cowl version. Also used a knit. Sewing down the pleats seemed like a neat finishing but turned out a bit weird on me.
Yeah, I’m not a fan of the stitched down pleats. They make a weird crease where the stitching stops that can be a bit unflattering…
Great colour. It sounds like you had a bit of work to put it together, but it looks good!
I think it is very lovely. I have only recently ventured into the world of sewing knits. May I suggest Butterick 5454? It is a fantastic pattern. (I think you’ve made it.) You could use the sleeves and bodice off of that pattern to make another one like this.
I do like my B5454 dress, I’ve been thinking about frankenpatterning it with something else, since I don’t love the skirt on it. I also love McCall’s 5974, but it takes so much fabric!
Wow, we are so on the same page with the crossover pieces- Ive been working on this one and in a woven they just wont lay down and behave! I love yours, its renewing my energy to finish mine!
Your dress looks great! I too bought this pattern a long time ago and have not made it yet. Someday….this fall….maybe. Haha!
Lovely dress, it’s worth the wait 🙂
You look so lovely in this dress! I had never heard of using clear elastic to finish a neckline, but now I’m going to try it with my next project.
Pingback: Leapin’ Liebsters! Oh, and a review of Simplicity 2145 | Pretty Grievances
I can’t believe that you even considered facings! hahah, glad you came to your senses though! I really like this colour on you, and the shape is really nice. I’m always surprised that all those gathers and pleats can be flattering despite all the fabric that goes in to them. It really looks very similar to the mccall’s 5974 but of course that pattern has no royal pedigree at all hahah
Ha, yes, well regardless of their respective pedigrees, 5975 is a better pattern. And it’s just as full of itself as the royal dress, since the McCall’s advertizes itself as “the perfect knit dress” – is that more or less pretentious?
Pingback: On the recurrence of good things | no time to sew
ALSO: this… curtain? Looks like it was custom painted exactly for you, I’ve never seen anything more your style. Also your hairs. They are the pretty.